Legal Opinion

Perez v. Persson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 2, 2013No. 08C20394; A150448PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Petitioner, who pleaded guilty to four counts of aggravated murder in the underlying criminal proceeding, petitioned for post-conviction relief alleging, among other things, that he had received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The post-conviction court granted petitioner partial relief, and he seeks review, asserting that the court should have granted additional relief. We reject most of petitioner’s assertions without discussion, but write to address petitioner’s concern that the post-conviction relief granted will be ineffective in implementing a plea agreement concerning his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Janowski v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Norris v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Rise v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Severy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. TriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perez v. CainDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API