Legal Opinion

Veerhoff v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 24, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term, Kings county. Actions by Mary E. Veerhoff, executrix of Ernest H. Veerhoff, deceased, against Mary E. Miller and others. From orders denying a motion for appointment of receiver of the rents of . the premises on foreclosure of mortgage, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

The moving papers disclose that the mortgages which are the subject of foreclosure by their terms became due and payable on the 24th day of February, 1898, at which time there was due and unpaid upon each the sum of $8,500, with interest thereon from August 24, 1897. It further appears that the persons who executed the mortgages are-pecuniarily irresponsible, and that the premises are not sufficient in value to pay the mortgage liens thereon. Default has been made in the actions by the mortgagors, and the only person who interposes an answer is a purchaser from the mortgagors, and the owner…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. DalesNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  2. De Frece v. National Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Homer v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Wyman v. Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance Co., of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Boutwell v. O'KeefeNew York Supreme Court · 1860

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wolkowsky v. KirchickSupreme Court of Florida · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API