Legal Opinion

Wolkowsky v. Kirchick

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 26, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County; JEO. Pierre Braiming, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

This is a suit brought to foreclose a mortgage on real estate. The bill is in the usual form with the note evidencing the indebtedness and the mortgage *416securing the payment of the same attached and made parts of the bill.

The second amended answer of the mortgagors sets up as a defense to the suit an alleged agreement between them and the mortgagee, entered into before the maturity of the note, by the terms of which the mortgagee extended the time for the payment of the indebtedness, and it is averred in substance that the suit was instituted before the expiration of the extended time, for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Faxton v. FaxonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Clark v. DalesNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  3. American Securities Co. v. GoldsberrySupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  4. Swon v. StevensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. Stone v. SpragueNew York Supreme Court · 1855

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Land v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Wolkowsky v. KirchickSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  3. Armton Corp. v. Brown, Jr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Bank of Commerce & Industry v. Rolls Construction Corp. (In re Rolls Construction Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API