Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Settles

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1915No. 3852PublishedCited by 14 opinions

• Error from District Action by H. E. Hopkins against Alvin E. Settles. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BREWER, C.

Plaintiff in error, Hopkins, a real estate agent, 'brought this suit in the court below to recover from defendant, Settles, the sum' of $500, alleged to be due as commission or compensation for his services in -connection with the sale of defendant’s half section of land ánd certain rights in an Indian lease, together with 80 acres of growing corn. At a trial of the case the jury returned a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff brings this proceeding in error.

Whatever conversation or understanding had between these parties relative to the sale of the farm was oral. It seems to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scully v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Ford v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Seattle Land Co. v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Burnett v. Edling EdlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Larson v. BurroughsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Menten v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. J. L. Lemmon Co. v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Worley v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Murphy v. W. & W. Livestock Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API