Legal Opinion

W.C. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Brooks/Maxi Drug, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided February 2, 2007No. 04195Published

1Opinion of the Court

MacDonald, D. Lloyd, J.

Before the Court is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. It is ALLOWED for the reasons that follow.

Pertinent Facts

The case arises from the construction of a Brooks brand pharmacy in New Bedford. The defendant Brooks/Maxi Drug, Inc. (“Brooks”) entered into a contract (“the general contract”) with C.P.C. ‘76, Inc. (“C.P.C.”) to build the store. Brooks leased the premises from the defendant P.J.C. Realty Co., Inc. (“P.J.C. Realty") but executed the general contract as the “owner.” P.J.C. Realty was not a signatory to the contract. The building was constructed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Blare v. Husky Injection Molding Systems Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API