Legal Opinion

Heggem v. Kilpatrick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 11, 1928No. 17917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIPPENDAPPER, C.

Defendants in error were plaintiffs, and plaintiffs in error were defendants below. The parties will herein be designated as in the trial court.

Plaintiffs sue for damages and in substance allege: That in 1917, plaintiffs and defendants Were joint owners of certain oil and gas properties in Bourbon and Crawford counties, Kan., consisting of about 2,'500 acres which had been blocked by plaintiffs, known and referred to as the Walnut property; that plaintiffs owned an undivided one-half interest; and that the parties were operating said property as co-owners ; that shortly prior…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gidney v. ChappellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Harris v. LloydMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. West v. MadanskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. McCoy v. WosikaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. MarlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Uptegraft v. Dome Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Berry v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CoulsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Streeter v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. FrenchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API