Legal Opinion
Flatt v. Williams
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided January 26, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 3:86-1080Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND STAY
NEESE, Senior District Judge.
The petitioner Mr. William Eugene Flatt applied pro se to this Court for the federal writ of habeas corpus and paid the required filing fee on December 29, 1986. He has not, however, made prepayment of other fees and costs or given security therefor; neither has he filed an affidavit of his indigency, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
Mr. Flatt claims that an adverse judgment and order of December 4,1986 in Flatt v. Lee and Roberts, no. C-86-2290A, was entered in his habeas corpus proceedings in the United States District Court for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States of America for the Use of Theodore A. Tanos v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Murphy v. Reifenhauser KG MaschinenfabrikDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.