Southwestern Pennsylvania Growth Alliance v. Browner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
This case arises under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q, as amended. The petitioner, the Southwestern Pennsylvania Growth Alliance, appeals the decision of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency directly to this Court under 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1). The petitioner argues that the EPA’s decision to redesignate the . Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, Ohio, area as an “attainment” area for ozone was arbitrary and capricious because the EPA failed to take into account the “regional” effect of ozone pollution—specifically the effect of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southwestern Pennsylvania Growth Alliance v. Carol BrownerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Connecticut v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. LTV Steel Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Southwestern Pennsylvania Growth Alliance v. Carol M. BrownerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998