Legal Opinion

Tennessee Valley Authority v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 8, 2002No. Nos. 00-12310, 00-12311, 00-12349, 00-12457 to 00-12459, 00-15936 and 00-16234 to 00-16236PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARKETT, Circuit Judge:

Pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b), the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), joined by a number of private power companies and industry associations, petitions for review of three orders issued to it by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).1 Centrally at *1188issue in these orders is EPA’s determination that certain maintenance and repair projects conducted by TVA at many of its coal-fired power plants in the past twenty years constituted “modifications” that required TVA to obtain pre-construction permits and to bring the plants into compliance with…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority, Georgia Power Company, Intervenor v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, John H. Hankinson, Jr., Regional Administrator, Alabama Power Company, Duke Energy Corporation, Georgia Power Company, Intervenor v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, John H. Hankinson, Jr., Regional Administrator, Tennessee Valley Authority, Georgia Power Company, Intervenor v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, John H. Hankinson, Jr., Regional Administrator, Tennessee Valley Authority, Georgia Power Company, Intervenor v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, John H. Hankinson, Jr., Regional Administrator, Alabama Power Company, Duke Energy Corporation, Georgia Power Company, Intervenor v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, John H. Hankinson, Jr., Regional Administrator, Tennessee Valley Authority, Georgia Power Company, Intervenor v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, John H. Hankinson, Jr., Regional Administrator, Tennessee Valley Authority v. Christine Todd Whitman, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama Power Company v. Christine Todd Whitman, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Tennessee Valley Public Power Association, Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, Electric Power Board of Chattanooga v. Christine Todd Whitman, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Duke Energy Corporation v. Christine Todd Whitman, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API