Legal Opinion

Roy D. Sutton and Charlene Sutton v. A.O. Smith Company, Defendant/third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Q-1 Motor Express of Jeffersonville, Indiana, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 14, 1999No. 98-2563Published

1Opinion of the Court

165 F.3d 561

Roy D. SUTTON and Charlene Sutton, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

A.O. SMITH COMPANY, Defendant/Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Q-1 Motor Express of Jeffersonville, Indiana,

Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant.

No. 98-2563.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 17, 1998.

Decided Jan. 14, 1999.

David G. Hatfield (submitted), Evansville, IN, Eric C. Young, Dunham, Boman & Leskera, Belleville, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees Roy D. Sutton and Charlene Sutton.

Kathy A. Wisniewski, Bryan Cave, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee A.O. Smith Company.

Jeffrey S.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ethyl Corp. v. Daniel Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Margolin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Just v. Land Reclamation Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Soverign Ins. Co. v. Texas Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API