Legal Opinion

Stong v. People ex rel. Curran

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 3, 1923No. 10,747PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Relator Curran is secretary of the Industrial Commission. His salary was fixed by the Commission and an appropriation was made by the General Assembly accordingly. The Governor disapproved a part of that appropriation. Relator brought mandamus to compel the Auditor of State to issue warrants for the salary as originally *284fixed. To review a judgment entered in relator’s favor in that action plaintiff in error prosecutes this writ. The sole question here presented is the power of the Governor to veto a part of this item in the appropriation bill. If he has such power the judgment must be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Commonwealth v. BarnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Fulmore v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. HolderMississippi Supreme Court · 1898
  5. May v. ToppingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Mills v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Wood v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Hudson v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Mandel v. O'HARACourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API