Legal Opinion

In re Calzadilla

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided June 17, 2015No. CASE NO. 14-11318-RAMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*217 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY AND INTERPRETING MEANING OF “SURRENDER” IN CHAPTER 13 PLANS

Robert A. Mark, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court

The Debtors in this chapter 13 case confirmed a plan that contemplated modification of their mortgage with U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S.Bank”). The Debtors pursued this modification under the Court’s Mortgage Modification Mediation Program Procedures (the “MMM Procedures”) adopted by this court’s Administrative Order 14-03. Under the court’s MMM Procedures, if mediation is unsuccessful, a debtor must amend the plan to conform to the lender’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pratt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Pratt)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. In re MetzlerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
  3. In Re WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
  4. In re FaillaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re LapeyreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2016
  2. In re ScottUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2017
  3. In re ElkoubyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API