Legal Opinion

Chadwick v. Aetna Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1970No. 7021DC481PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

The crux of defendant’s appeal lies in its eighth assignment of error which asserts error in the trial court’s construction of the exclusionary provision of the policy quoted above. The trial judge instructed the jury, in effect, that it was not to be concerned whether the loss was an “unexplained loss” or a “mysterious disappearance” unless it was disclosed on taking inventory. He clearly instructed the jury that the provision of the policy quoted above contained only one exclusion, i.e., “loss or shortage disclosed on taking inventory.” We disagree with this interpretation.

It is well…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walsh v. United Insurance Company of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Henderson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. American Motorists InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. HoyleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Wexler Knitting Mills v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. HCA, Inc. v. American Protection Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  5. Blue Stripe, Inc. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API