Legal Opinion

Connell v. Galligher

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1893No. 4780PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appear from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Tiffany, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

The real property which is the subject-matter of this action is lot 6 in Smith & Griffin's addition to the city of Omaha. This lot is a part of the northwest quarter of section 28, in township 15 north, range 13 east of the 6th principal meridian. The opinion of the supreme court in O’Brien v. Gaslin, 20 Neb., 347, settled several questions as to lots 8, 9, and 12 in this same addition, thereby eliminating similar questions from this action. In the case just cited will be found an abstract of the title of the above described 80-acre tract, covering many of the conveyances hereinafter…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Slayton v. Inhabitants of ChesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  4. Ladd & Tilton v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Freydendall v. BaldwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Horbach v. TyrrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Arlington Mill & Elevator Co. v. YatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. McKnight v. PettigrewWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Pinnacle Arabians, Inc. v. SchmidtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Baldwin v. BurtNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API