Legal Opinion

Mannesmann-Meer, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 7, 1965No. 69224; protest 61/21107 (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The suit listed above challenges the classification of the collector of customs of an importation described on the entry papers variously as a “complete tube welding plant,” or a “tube welding machine,” under the provisions of paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dee. 121, T.D. 52739, as an article having as an essential feature an electrical element or device. 'By virtue of this classification, the merchandise was assessed with duty thereunder at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem.

P…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Donalds Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. United States v. Wyman & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Mannesmann-Meer, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API