McCarthy v. Weare Commission Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover |5,611.25 and interest upon an account stated. The case was tried before Ensign, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff: for the sum demanded. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action on an account stated.
The complaint alleged that the defendant was a corporation engaged in the business of buying and selling grain and stocks, and for that purpose maintained a branch office in the city of Duluth, which was at all times herein stated in charge of George Rupley as its manager, and, further, that between February 1 and May 10, 1901, the plaintiffs and defendant had mutual financial dealings, and on the day last named an account was stated between them, and a balance of $5,611.25 was found to be due plaintiffs from defendant, which it agreed to pay, but has not. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Mohr v. MiesenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fibro Trust, Inc. v. Brahman Financial, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
- Campbell v. WillisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
- Scales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Fraser v. Farmers Co-Operative Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Askegaard v. DalenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.