Legal Opinion

United States v. One (1) Lot of Twenty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars ($24,900.00) in U.S. Currency, Robert Chemaly, Claimant-Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 17, 1985No. 84-5207PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge:

Appellant United States appeals a district court order dismissing its complaint for forfeiture in rem, brought under 31 U.S.C. § 5317(b). The district court held that the complaint failed to state a claim under 31 U.S.C. § 5317(b) because it did not allege that Robert Chemaly, the traveler who allegedly failed to report the currency in compliance with 31 U.S.C. § 5316, acted with knowledge of the currency reporting requirements. We affirm, holding that such knowledge is an element of a civil forfeiture action brought pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 5317(b). 1

FACTS

In 1982,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. John L. Warren, Jr., David Defina, Des E. Schick and Thomas A. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Townsend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  5. United States v. Araceli Cremata GrandaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. $359,500 in United States Currency, Benedetto Romano, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Michael Wesley O'banion, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. $94,000.00 in United States Currency, Along With Any Interest Earned Thereon in First Financial Savings Ass'n Account 79-70063411Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. $359,500 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1986
  5. United States v. One Hundred Twenty-two Thousand Forty-three Dollars ($122,043.00) In United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API