Moore v. York
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
By this action plaintiff in error, James F. Moore, hereafter referred to as “plaintiff", seeks to recover damages from defendants in error, Grady York, hereafter referred to as “York”, and National Bank of Tulsa, hereafter referred to as “bank”, which allegedly resulted from the latter’s causing plaintiff to be charged with and tried in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, for the offense of obtaining money from bank under false pre-tences. When defendants in error are referred to collectively, the reference will be “defendants”.
At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case in chief in the instant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. FreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Patrick v. WigleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Miller v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Brown v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Empire Oil & Refining Co. v. CambronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Michael Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation, D/B/A Target Stores, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Parker v. City of Midwest CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Browning v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Atkins v. LanningDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1976
- Powell v. LeForceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.