Dep't of Indus. Relations v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
Gary Allen Bradburn died as a proximate result of an industrial injury. Jeremy Shannon (Harrison) Tessler (hereafter for convenience, Jeremy) entered into a “Compromise and Release” with Bradburn’s employer and its insurance carrier under which, as a partial dependent of the deceased worker, she would be paid a lump sum benefit of $10,000. When the parties sought its approval of their agreement, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) ordered that the State of California’s Department of Industrial Relations (State) be joined as a party to the proceedings. (See Lab.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Wotton v. BushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Santa Clara v. Von RaesfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Moore Shipbuilding Corp. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Norman v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Taylor v. FieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Ledger v. TippittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Fremont Compensation Insurance v. Sierra Pine, LTD.California Court of Appeal · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.