Legal Opinion

United States v. Deborah Gore Dean

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 6, 1993No. 92-3180PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON.

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

This appeal grows out of the Independent Counsel’s investigation of allegations that former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Samuel Pierce, Jr. and other HUD officials violated certain federal laws in awarding HUD grants and contracts. The district court ruled that defendant Deborah Gore Dean had to produce certain government records in response to a grand jury subpoena but that the Independent Counsel could not use evidence of Dean’s act of production against her at…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. SafavianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Russell McLaughlin Jr., in No. 96-1982. United States of America v. Mark McLaughlin in No. 96-2000Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Thorp v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Freedom of the Press Foundation v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API