Legal Opinion
Claim of Wagner v. Emile & Robert Beauty Salon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.
Appeal
*609by the employer and its carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board denying the taking of new evidence in one case and the reopening of an earlier ease. In 1951, claimant developed contact dermatitis while working for a different employer. An award was made and the case was eventually closed. Thereafter, in 1954, she again developed dermatitis while working for appellant employer. In her claim for compensation she disclosed the 1951 injury, and this earlier injury was also mentioned in a physician’s report. The appellant employer did not at that time contest the claim,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claim of Carinci v. Pittston Stevedoring Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Matter of Carinci v. Pittston Stevedoring Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of Barone v. Interstate Maintenance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Rusyniak v. Syracuse Flying School, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Claim of Rusyniak v. Syracuse Flying School, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Claim of Rusyniak v. Syracuse Flying School, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975