Legal Opinion

State v. Abraham

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 22, 1925No. 27231PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

Defendant appeals from a sentence for selling an intoxicating liquor called “Imitation Pear Extract,” for beverage purposes.

The only bill of exceptions presented to our consideration is one reserved to the overruling of a motion for a new trial, in which it is claimed by defendant that the evidence was not sufficient to convict him; that pear extract is a nonintoxicating beverage; that there was no analysis or proof that it actually contained the percentage of alcohol set forth in the answer to the bill of particulars; that the court took judicial cognizance of the intoxicating character of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewinsohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
  2. Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  3. Heitler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
  4. State v. SeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. State v. ProphetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  3. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  4. State v. EmersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  5. State v. KirkbrideWyoming Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API