State v. Abraham
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.
Defendant appeals from a sentence for selling an intoxicating liquor called “Imitation Pear Extract,” for beverage purposes.
The only bill of exceptions presented to our consideration is one reserved to the overruling of a motion for a new trial, in which it is claimed by defendant that the evidence was not sufficient to convict him; that pear extract is a nonintoxicating beverage; that there was no analysis or proof that it actually contained the percentage of alcohol set forth in the answer to the bill of particulars; that the court took judicial cognizance of the intoxicating character of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewinsohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
- Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Heitler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- State v. SeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- State v. ProphetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- State v. EmersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- State v. KirkbrideWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.