Legal Opinion

Ohm v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1890No. 13,689PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; John F. Finn, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This is an action in equity for a decree declaring the appellant to be the owner of certain premises situate in the city and county of San Francisco, commonly called, in early times, the “Sherrebeck Claim,” and adjudging that the defendants hold the legal title in trust for plaintiff; and also for rents and profits up to the time of the filing of the complaint, in the sum of $1,500,000, and at the rate of $250,000 per month from that date (August 1, 1885) to the date of judgment. Defendants demurred to the complaint on several grounds, and, among others, that it failed to state facts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Fremont v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  5. More v. SteinbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Little v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Durham v. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Durham v. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API