Hastings v. Drew
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.
The evidence does not establish that the sale of the steamboat “ C. Vanderbilt,” and four-fifths of the “ Francis Skiddy,” made on the 15th February, 1864, was in fact perfected, or that the corporation known as the “ New Jersey Steam Navigation Company ” parted with its interest in said boats, in pursuance of such supposed sale.
The price bid, $85,000, by Vanderbilt was not paid to the corporation and the vessels were continued to be run thereafter in the name of the “ Troy line ” as before.
It is true that some-of the stockholders were paid off upon the basis of the price fixed for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miller v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Bartlett v. DrewNew York Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by2 opinions
- St. Louis & Sandoval Coal & Mining Co. v. Sandoval Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Christensen v. QuintardNew York Supreme Court · 1885