Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Drew

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1874PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

The evidence does not establish that the sale of the steamboat “ C. Vanderbilt,” and four-fifths of the “ Francis Skiddy,” made on the 15th February, 1864, was in fact perfected, or that the corporation known as the “ New Jersey Steam Navigation Company ” parted with its interest in said boats, in pursuance of such supposed sale.

The price bid, $85,000, by Vanderbilt was not paid to the corporation and the vessels were continued to be run thereafter in the name of the “ Troy line ” as before.

It is true that some-of the stockholders were paid off upon the basis of the price fixed for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Bartlett v. DrewNew York Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis & Sandoval Coal & Mining Co. v. Sandoval Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Christensen v. QuintardNew York Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API