Legal Opinion
Bank of Ukiah v. Rice
California Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1904No. S.F. No. 3705PublishedCited by 28 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, C.
Action for the partition of certain real estate.
The land of which partition is sought was owned by Charles Coleman Rice in his lifetime and at the time of his death. He died January 11, 1891, leaving a last will and testament in which he appointed his wife, Jane Rice, and his son, Benjamin F. Rice, executors thereof, and, after disposing of certain portions of his estate, made the following disposition of the land in question, viz.:—
“I give and bequeath to my wife Jane Rice all the balance of my ranch saving and excepting any part thereof which I have heretofore disposed of, to be…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Sears v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Ebey v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Hetzel v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Baker v. CopenbargerIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Thornagel v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Baker v. Commissioner of Corp. & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Williams v. LobbanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Campbell v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- McCaughna v. BilhornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.