Legal Opinion
Huard v. Town of Pelham
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 31, 2009No. 2009-228PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The petitioner, Alfred Huard, appeals three orders of the Superior Court (Groff, J., Nicolosi, J., and Barry, J.) in favor of the respondents, Town of Pelham, Roland Soucy, acting code enforcement officer, and Jeffrey Gowan, town planning officer. The first order denied his motion to enforce settlement. The second and third orders granted the town’s motions for summary judgment. We affirm.
The following facts are not in dispute. Huard owned and operated an automobile transmission repair business. In 2004, he purchased property at 3 Windham Road, located in a residential zone. He used the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Burrows v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- In re Trailer & Plumbing SuppliesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bosonetto v. Town of RichmondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Knapik v. Mary Hitchcock Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2015