Legal Opinion
Consumer Concepts, Inc. v. Mego Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 12, 1978No. 78 Civil 3353PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Consumer Concepts, Inc. (“Concepts”) brought this suit for an injunction and damages against defendant Mego Corporation (“Mego”) charging that Mego’s manufacture of a toy violated its duty of non-use and non-disclosure of confidential information conveyed to it by Concepts. Mego now moves, pursuant to section three of the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925, 1 to stay these proceedings pending arbitration. Since the dispute is embraced by an enforceable arbitration clause, Mego’s motion is granted.
Concepts is a firm that develops new ideas for toys…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Security Watch, Inc. v. Sentinel Systems, Inc. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- S.A. Mineracao Da Trindade-Samitri v. Utah International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- S.A. Mineracao Da Trindade-Samitri v. Utah International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Coffman v. Provost ★ Umphrey Law Firm, L.L.P.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
- Bowlby v. Carter Manufacturing Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.