Rodriquez v. State

I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court lacked sufficient facts to find that the appellant displayed or exhibited a firearm during *447the commission of the delivery of cocaine offense.

APPLICABLE LAW

As the majority acknowledges, the test is whether the testimony showed that the deadly weapon facilitated the commission of the associated offense. See Narron v. State, 835 S.W.2d 642, 644 (Tex.Crim.App.1992); Jackson v. State, 857 S.W.2d 678, 682 (Tex.App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, pet. ref'd). The weapon must be utilized to achieve an intended result,…