Legal Opinion

Wynn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 3, 1993No. 228-93PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. Health & Safety Code, § 481.112. The trial judge assessed punishment at thirty years confinement and a $10,000.00 fine. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Wynn v. State, 847 S.W.2d 357 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals decided a question of state law in conflict with the applicable decisions of this Court. Tex.RApp.P. 200(c)(3). We will affirm.

I

T…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Aguilar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Wynn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Eastep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  3. Gale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API