Legal Opinion

State v. Vailencour

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 22, 1996No. 35042-1-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C.J.

Ronald Vailencour appeals his conviction for third degree assault. He seeks reversal based on violation of the speedy trial rule, arguing that the court erred by assigning a constructive arraignment date approxi mately five months after the State filed charges against him.

We hold that the State’s failure to send notice of arraignment to Vailencour at an address provided to the police by Vailencour’s sister does not warrant reversal. No prejudice resulted to Vailencour, because the address was not correct, and he would not have received notice of the charges against him even if the State had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. State v. PortomeneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HeadWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API