Legal Opinion

Lipscomb ex rel. DeFehr v. Simmons

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 27, 1992No. 87-4079PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Oregon provides state-funded foster care benefits to all children placed by the state with non-relatives, but it does not provide state-funded foster care for children placed with relatives. We consider whether Oregon’s attempt to stretch its foster care dollar violates the United States Constitution. We conclude that it does not.

I. BACKGROUND

Class plaintiffs,1 challenging the constitutionality of the Oregon system for state funding of foster home care in certain juvenile court placements, appeal a summary judgment order upholding the statutory scheme. A three-judge…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lipscomb v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Brenda S.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Bates v. PaksereshtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  4. L.M.W. v. Arizona, State ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  5. Virginia Duncan v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API