Tittizer v. Union Gas Corp.
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The parties dispute the amount of royalties that an oil and gas lessee owes landowners under the pooling provisions of multiple oil and gas leases. The landowner argues that her lease’s pooling provisions entitle her to royalties on the pooled unit from the date of first production. The lessee argues that royalties are due from the later date of recordation of the Designation of Pooled Unit. We agree with the lessee and affirm in part the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case to the court of appeals to consider the reasonableness of attorneys’ fees.
In 1999, Union Gas…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- In the Interest of B.L.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- Holley v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by226 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Department of Family & Protective ServicesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Samson Exploration, LLC (Formerly Samson Lone Star, L.P.) v. T.S. Reed Properties, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
- Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Prize Energy Resources, L.P. v. Cliff Hoskins, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.