Legal Opinion

State v. Miglavs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 2003No. C000009CR, C000111CR A111137 (Control), A111138Published

1Opinion of the Court

63 P.3d 1202 (2003)

186 Or. App. 420

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Daniel Paul MIGLAVS, Appellant.

C000009CR, C000111CR; A111137 (Control), A111138.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 4, 2002.

Resubmitted December 11, 2002.

Decided February 19, 2003.

Garrett A. Richardson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before DEITS, Chief Judge, and EDMONDS, LANDAU, HASELTON, ARMSTRONG,…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Edmonds; Dissent · Armstrong.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API