Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1922No. 14227PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Writ or Error to the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. George A. Crow, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

It is agreed by the parties that Henry Springer, the claimant, was an employee of plaintiff in error, Swift & Co., at East St. Louis, on October 21, 1918, and on that date received an injury which arose out of and in the course of the employment, of which' plaintiff in error had notice, and that demand for compensation was made within the time required by law, and that the employer and employee were both under the Workmen’s Compensation act. The claimant is a single man, having no children under the age of sixteen years, and his average wage for the year preceding his injury was $1248, or $24…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Voight v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Vulcan Detinning Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. O. W. Rosenthal & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Decatur Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Jersey Ice Cream Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Dahl v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Zant v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. St. Louis & O'Fallon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API