Legal Opinion

American Bemberg Corp. v. City of Elizabethton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1943PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

Complainants filed their bill to have declared unconstitutional'Chapter 3 of the Private Acts of 1943, and to enjoin the defendant City of Elizabethton from assessing and collecting- taxes on their property. The Act in question undertakes to extend the corporate limits of the City of Elizabethton so as to bring the area owned by complainants into the city limits.

Complainants assert that the Act violates contracts had with the City in that their plants were located near the City with the understanding that their property was not to be taken into the corporation of the City; that said Acts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Commissioners of Laramie County v. COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  4. Blake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Attorney General of Michigan Ex Rel. Kies v. LowreySupreme Court of the United States · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Nashville v. State Board of EqualizationTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  2. C. G. Gomillion v. Phil M. Lightfoot, as Mayor of the City of TuskegeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Weaver v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Federal Express Corp. v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Metropolitan Government v. Nashville Pi Beta Phi House Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API