Legal Opinion

Carling v. Purcell

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 14, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by John Carling against William Purcell. There was judgment for defendant, and from an order dismissing an appeal from the general term of the city court, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

Plaintiff sought to appeal to this court from a judgment of the general term of the city court of New York, which affirmed a judgment for defendant. To that end he served his notice, of appeal, but did not give the security required to perfect the appeal by section 1341 of the Code of Civil Procedure before its amendment by chapter 450, Laws 1890. Defendant thereupon, under the provisions of rule 11 of the special rules, applied to this court at special term, and on notice to plaintiff, for an order dis*559missing the appeal. This order was granted, and from it the present appeal is attempted to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knapp v. . the City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Matter of Alter'g, Etc., Main St., Sing SingNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Raymond v. . RichmondNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Lane v. HumbertNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  5. Benedict Burnham Manufacturing Company v. . ThayerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Bank v. GossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of HammerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
  3. Quigg v. International Shirt & Collar Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  4. Brooker v. FilkinsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  5. Schnitzer v. WillnerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API