Legal Opinion
In re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 20, 2012No. 111015PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
T1 The Oklahoma Capital Improvement Authority (OCIA) has applied for the Court's approval of revenue bonds pursuant to 73 0.8. Supp.2009 § 336.1 We determine that the proposed bonds are unconstitutional. Accordingly, we deny the application.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
T2 In 2009, the Oklahoma Legislature passed Senate Bill No. 289 which became *1279codified at 73 O.S. Supp. 2009 § 336.2 This statute concerns the Arkansas River, it authorized the OCIA to improve the City of Tulsa's Zink Dam and to construct two lower-water dams along the Arkansas River, as well as stabilize the stream. Efforts were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Trapp, State Auditor v. Cook Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- In re Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority for Approval of $50 Million Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority State Regents for Higher Education Endowed Chairs Funding Program Bonds, Taxable Series 2004Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- Questions Submitted by: The Honorable Glen Mulready and the Honorable Jason Blair, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2025
- MARSHALL COUNTY v. HOMESALES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- MARSHALL COUNTY v. HOMESALES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- MARSHALL COUNTY v. HOMESALES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- MURRAY COUNTY v. HOMESALES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.