People v. Todd

Opinion by

MR. JUSTICE ERICKSON.

Defendants, Clinton and Thaylen Todd, were convicted by a jury of theft by deception (1971 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 1963, 40-4-401) 1 and conspiracy to commit theft (C.R.S. 1963, 40-7-35). 2 On appeal, the defendants assert as error: (1) The admission of a purchase refund check and testimony relating to a telephone call. (2) Violation of their right to remain silent by the prosecuting attorney’s statement on closing argument that the evidence was uncontradicted. (3) Sufficiency of the evidence. Reversible error does not appear in the record, and we, therefore, affirm.