Legal Opinion

Guerrero v. SFS Beauty CA LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 26, 2025No. 3:25-cv-01133Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEJANDRO GUERRERO, Case No.: 25-cv-1133-JES-KSC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO 14 SFS BEAUTY CA LLC; DUTY FREE REMAND; and PARTNERS; KYMBERLI PARKER; 15 ESTÉE LAUDER TRAVEL (2) DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS 16 RETAIL SERVICES INC.; and DOES 2- AS MOOT 20, inclusive, 17 Defendants. [ECF Nos. 5, 13] 18 19 Pending before the Court are two motions filed by the parties: (1) Defendant Estée 20 Lauder’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5); and (2) Plaintiff’s motion to remand (ECF No. 21 13). The parties…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API