Legal Opinion

Haus v. Mayor

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 10, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BRODY, J.A.D.

This appeal requires us to interpret that portion of N.J.S.A. 40A:9-165 which protects a municipal tax assessor, municipal tax collector and municipal clerk (protected officers) from being denied “without good cause an increase in salary given to all other municipal officers and employees____” In the only reported opinion on the subject, Judge Rimm found that the statute protected a municipal tax assessor whom the governing body obviously had singled out for a token raise as a political reprisal. Mun. Assessors of N.J. v. Mullica Tp., 225…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Peper v. Princeton University Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Reingold v. HarperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. Ass'n of Mun. Assessors of NJ v. Mullica Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. Cabarle v. Governing Body of Tp. of PembertonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of Secaucus v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2000
  2. Association of Municipal Assessors v. Borough of MerchantvilleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Association of Municipal Assessors v. Township of BarnegatNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. Hyland v. Township of LebanonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API