Modern Continental Construction Co. v. Building Inspector
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
1. The undisputed facts. The plaintiff owns the locus in issue, “Lookout Farm,” which it uses for the production and sale of fruit, vegetables, herbs, and livestock, including ostrich, deer, lamb, calves, sheep, goats, chicken, pheasants, peacock, and rabbits. The farm is about 110 to 115 acres and has been in continuous agricultural use for over three hundred years. It is situated in a zoning district in which farms for raising, keeping, and selling certain animals are allowed as matter of right.1
Animals raised on the locus are kept for breeding purposes, sold live, or sent off premises for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Building Inspector of Mansfield v. CurvinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Deutschmann v. Board of Appeals of CantonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Jackson v. Building Inspector of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Steege v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Town of Tisbury v. Martha's Vineyard CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Town of Natick v. Modern Continental ConstructionMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
- Minty v. ArenaMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998