Legal Opinion

Bates v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1927No. 258PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF COURT.

The following is taken, verbatim, from the opinion.

HOUCK, J.

It will he observed that the accused did not testify and he offered no evidence in his defense. Therefore, all of the -proper, competent and legal evidence presented by the State, in the trial stood uncontradicted and undisputed.

Counsel for plaintiff in error relies upon two grounds for a reversal of the judgment of conviction against his client, to-wit:(1) That the trial judge committed prejudicial error, after the state had rested its case, in not sustaining the motion to require the state to elect upon which count…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Van Camp v. RileyOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. PoagueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Tamele v. BrinkmanMedina County Court of Common Pleas · 1972
  4. Hoop v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. State v. DavisCincinnati Municipal Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API