Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Paull
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, Chief Judge.
The parties have been unable to agree upon the terms and provisions of a judgment to be entered upon the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, issued September 27, 1961, and filed herein on September 29, 1961.
The controversy between the parties was heard on November 6, 1961, and at the conclusion of the hearing, the court orally announced certain conclusions, but upon further consideration the court, on November 13, 1961, entered an order striking the oral statement and directions as to the terms and provisions of the judgment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. KulpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Luminous Unit Co. v. Freeman-Sweet Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- Commercial Nat. Bank v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Bankers' Savings & Loan Ass'n of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Claiborne-Reno Co. v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- R. C. Paull, Virginia Paull and Paull's Hatchery, Inc. v. Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963