Legal Opinion
Caley v. Thornquist
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1903No. Nos. 13,445—(100)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal by defendant from an order .of the district court for Mille Lacs county, Baxter, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
This action was brought by á landlord against his tenant in justice court for the recovery of a saloon building in the village of Princeton. Restitution was adjudged, from which there was an appeal.
At the trial in the district court it was undisputed that on January 26, 1900, plaintiff rented the premises to defendant for one year commencing February 1,1900, rent to be paid each month in advance under the terms of a written lease, which contained the following clause:
“It is understood and agreed that the' said lessee may renew this lease at its expiration for the term of two years from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Delashman v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Long v. . StaffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Insurance & Law Building Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Montgomery v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Kelso v. KellyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1860
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. HirschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Hotel Allen Co. v. Estate of AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Luthey v. JoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Quade v. FitzloffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Buckland v. TarbleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.