Legal Opinion

Insurance & Law Building Co. v. National Bank

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1879PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error to St. Louis Court of Appeals. in argument cited Taylor on Landlord and Tenant, § 332; Thiebaud v. National Bank, 42 Ind. 212; Bradford v. Patten, 108 Mass. 153; Hunter v.-Silvers, 15 111. 174; Finney v. St. Louis, 39 Mo. 177; Bircher v. Parker, 40 Mo. 119; Constant v. Abell, 36 Mo. 174; Grant v. White, 42 Mo. 285 ; Hammon v. Douglas, 50 Mo. 434; s. c., 50 Mo. 442. in argument cited Taylor on Landlord and Tenant, §§ 15, 81, 332, 43, 32; Kramer v. Cook, 7 Gray 550;…

Read the full summary

Error to St. Louis Court of Appeals. in argument cited Taylor on Landlord and Tenant, § 332; Thiebaud v. National Bank, 42 Ind. 212; Bradford v. Patten, 108 Mass. 153; Hunter v.-Silvers, 15 111. 174; Finney v. St. Louis, 39 Mo. 177; Bircher v. Parker, 40 Mo. 119; Constant v. Abell, 36 Mo. 174; Grant v. White, 42 Mo. 285 ; Hammon v. Douglas, 50 Mo. 434; s. c., 50 Mo. 442. in argument cited Taylor on Landlord and Tenant, §§ 15, 81, 332, 43, 32; Kramer v. Cook, 7 Gray 550; House v. Barr, 24 Barb. 525; Levitsky v. Canning, 33 Oal. 299; Delashman v. Berry, 20 Mich. 292; Orton v. Noonan, 27 Wis.…

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.

On the 1st day of May, 1867, the plaintiff leased to the defendant a certain building or banking house in the city of St. Louis, “ for and during the term of three years at the yearly rent of $7,000, payable $583.33 monthly, when due.” Said lease, which was signed by both parties, contained the following stipulations: “ The said lessee, and all holding under it, hereby engage to pay the rent above reserved, and double rent for every day it, or any. one else in its name, shall hold on to the whole, or any part of said tenement after the expiration of this lease.” * * “ The said lessee has the…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Marshall Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Bussen v. Del CommuneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Quinn v. ValiquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  4. Hamby & Toomer v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API