Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Kelly
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 29, 1978No. CIV-78-0070-EPublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
EUBANKS, District Judge.
This action was brought by the Secretary of Labor on January 27,1978 pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a) against the defendant, Arthur M. Kelly, seeking relief for alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The defendant filed an answer denying any violations of ERISA and raising several affirmative defenses. Trial was had to the Court on December 4-7, 1978. The Court, having heard the evidence presented and read the briefs and findings and conclusions proposed by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Marshall v. SnyderDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Eaves v. PennDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
3Cited by52 opinions
- Chao v. Hall Holding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Iron Workers Local 272 v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Donovan v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Donovan v. BierwirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Donovan v. MazzolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.