Legal Opinion

American National Co. v. Thompson Spot Welder Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The sole question presented to the court in this proceeding in error is whether or not the court of common pleas erred in sustaining a demurrer to the answer.

The plaintiff below, the Thompson Spot Welder Company, brought an action against the defendant, the American National Company, to recover the so-called royalty upon a contract licensing a spot-welding machine. After a demurrer to the answer was sustained, the defendant below not desiring to plead further, a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount claimed, with interest.

After averring, the corporate existence of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. United States v. Harvey Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Dillman v. NadlehofferIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Reeves v. CorningU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1892
  5. Skinner v. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Litton ABS v. Red-Yellow Cab Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Horvath v. LeftonCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API