Legal Opinion
Sanpietro v. Collins
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1967No. Civ. 30090PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tern. *
The defendants are appealing from a summary judgment entered in this action, which is based upon a summary judgment entered in a superior court in Arizona.
We are satisfied that the declaration in support of plaintiffs’ motion in this action contained facts entitling them to the California judgment which they obtained, and that the defendants failed to set forth facts showing that they had a good or substantial defense to plaintiffs’ cause of action. In such a situation a summary judgment in plaintiffs’ favor is authorized by section 437e, Code of Civil Procedure, and so…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- MacKey v. SpanglerArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Heuer v. HeuerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- D. W. Onan & Sons, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman SchnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- McGuire v. BrightmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Younker v. Reseda ManorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Craig v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- United Bank of Denver v. K & W TRUCKING CO.California Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.