Legal Opinion

Goodpasture, Inc. v. M/V Pollux

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1979No. 79-2507PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

The facts of this unfortunate case present a maritime version of the eternal triangle, one in which the difficulties arising between each of the three (or perhaps four or five) actors transcend their relationship to bedevil the others.

Plaintiff Goodpasture, Inc. is a Texas corporation that deals in wheat. Defendant M/V POLLUX, an oceangoing vessel engaged in commerce upon navigable waters of the United States, is owned by defendant Negocios del Mar, a foreign corporation. Negocios del Mar has no offices or permanent officials in the United States, no property there except…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. R. W. Norris, Jr., Plainitff-Appellee-Cross v. Bovina Feeders, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Bankers Life Insurance Company of Nebraska v. Scurlock Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Waterman Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. The LydiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. T. J. Stevenson & Co. v. 81,193 Bags of FlourCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Goodpasture, Inc. v. M/V PolluxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. T. J. Stevenson & Co., Inc., a Corporation, and Counterclaimant, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. 81,193 Bags of Flour, Etc., Adm Milling Co., Inc., Counterclaimant & Third Party Plaintiff- Cross-Appellee v. T. J. Stevenson & Co., Inc., Mv Nedon, Etc., as to Counterclaim, Republic of Bolivia, Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Tourism, Third Party Counterclaimant-Appellee, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Prozina Shipping Co. v. Thirty-four AutomobilesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  5. Furness Withy (Chartering), Inc., Panama v. World Energy Systems Associates, Inc., Wesa, Inc., Hemmert Shipping Corporation and Texas Chartering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API