Legal Opinion

Roesch v. Bray

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1988No. E-87-24PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause is before the court on an appeal from a judgment rendered by the Erie County Court of Common Pleas.

Appellants filed a timely notice of appeal asserting the following as their sole assignment of error:

“The court erred in restricting the plaintiffs’ award to consequential damages. The court failed to include the expectancy damage amount, suffered by the plaintiffs, in the judgment.”

Appellees filed a cross-appeal asserting the following as their sole assignment of error:

“The court erred in awarding the plaintiffs damages for the costs of holding the property for resale and interest…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCarty v. LinghamOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Kemp v. GannettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Gryb v. BensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Dudock v. AlexanderOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Lucke v. EisenstadtOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dr. Gopal Potti, Kamala Potti, Vinayak Potti, a Minor, and Lakshmi Potti, a Minor, Cross-Appellants v. Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. Desantis v. SollerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Kaufman v. ByersOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Father's House Internatl., Inc. v. KurguzOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. MacDonald v. Authentic Invests., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API