Legal Opinion
Roesch v. Bray
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 1988No. E-87-24PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
This cause is before the court on an appeal from a judgment rendered by the Erie County Court of Common Pleas.
Appellants filed a timely notice of appeal asserting the following as their sole assignment of error:
“The court erred in restricting the plaintiffs’ award to consequential damages. The court failed to include the expectancy damage amount, suffered by the plaintiffs, in the judgment.”
Appellees filed a cross-appeal asserting the following as their sole assignment of error:
“The court erred in awarding the plaintiffs damages for the costs of holding the property for resale and interest…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCarty v. LinghamOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Kemp v. GannettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Gryb v. BensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Dudock v. AlexanderOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lucke v. EisenstadtOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dr. Gopal Potti, Kamala Potti, Vinayak Potti, a Minor, and Lakshmi Potti, a Minor, Cross-Appellants v. Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Desantis v. SollerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Kaufman v. ByersOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Father's House Internatl., Inc. v. KurguzOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- MacDonald v. Authentic Invests., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.